Category: United States
Bob Menendez Bad Lawyer
U.S. Senator Robert Menendez Senator Robert Menendez, His Wife, And Three New Jersey Businessmen Charged With Bribery Offenses Friday, September 22, 2023 U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York Robert Menendez Allegedly Agreed to Use His Official Position to Benefit Wael Hana, Jose Uribe, Fred Daibes, and the Government of Egypt in Exchange for Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars of Bribes to Menendez and His Wife Nadine Menendez, Which Included Gold Bars, Cash, and a Luxury Convertible Damian Williams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and James Smith, the Assistant Director in Charge of… Continue reading
COURT VICTIM SOLUTION
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving… Continue reading
Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide
History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger… Continue reading
Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide
History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger… Continue reading
5/12/2023 US Supreme Court Petition for Rehearing filed Petition not Opposed Supreme Court Conference Set For June 8, 2023
The petition for rehearing is one of the most important cases before the Supreme Court. It will require the state government executive branch, legislative branch and judicial branch to uphold their oath of office to obey the U.S. Constitution and not “war against the Constitution”. It requires the U.S. Supreme Court to follow its precedents of Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. School Board and Cooper v. Aaron requiring the Supreme Court sets the law, due process must be followed and violating the oath of office is “war against the Constitution”, respectively. To deny the Petition for Rehearing, will be to… Continue reading
Who Sold Out the People and Justice Corrupt Justice Ronald M. George
Corrupt Chief Justice Ronald Marc George What is totally disgusting about this man is how he hides the criminal he really is via the background of high-end legal law schools, awards and assignments, but the truth is, he created SBX 2 11 to help his fellow lawyers and judges to escape any accountability or prosecution for being part of the exposed bribery of over 90% of California Superior court judges. This is common for the most evil, dishonorable, criminal judges or lawyers to hide behind a false image of good or honesty. Would an honorable person create SBX 211? More… Continue reading
Dr. Richard I. Fine’s Personal Experience “Will the corruption finally end?”
Will the Corruption Finally End? Involved Players in the silencing of Dr. Richard I. Fine, exposing the majority of California Superior Court Judges to accepting bribes. If this is what the top justice and Supreme court do when an ethical BAR member exposes bribery and corruption, it only confirms how corrupt the entire BAR and court system is No. 22-782 Title: Carol Pulliam, Petitioner v. University of Southern California Docketed: February 17, 2023 Lower Ct: Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District Case Numbers: (B304749) Decision Date: August 23, 2022 Rehearing Denied: September 8, 2022 Discretionary Court Decision Date:… Continue reading
FBI Director Christopher Wray ignored Corruption Get BAR members OUT of Government or Any Public Service
Millions of Court Victims are ignored by the FBI when they report Judicial Corruption It’s not rocket science when you consider that lawyers are in an organized gang (the American Legal BAR). They swear an oath as well. It’s common knowledge that if a lawyer exposes its own BAR members for corruption, crimes, bribery or abuse, they are disbarred. See Dr. Richard I. Fine Why is this? Same as the US government lies to us and claims we have whistleblower protection laws, try using these laws, they are useless. Look at Julian Assange, Edward Snowden both who exposed government crimes,… Continue reading
Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE
“Richard I. Fine Presents the argument against paying County or Court Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments to Judges, to the US Supreme Court.” In The Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner, vs. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of California PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI RICHARD ISAAC FINE, ESQ. P.O. Box 789, 1187 Coast Village Rd., Ste. 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93102-0789 Telephone: (310) 622-6900 Email: richardfine@richardfinelaw.com Counsel for Petitioner Carol Pulliam COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Do state court trial judges, court… Continue reading